The 3-Day Workflow Proof
Give us one job your team still does by hand. In 3 days, watch software do it.
Send representative examples and show us how the job is done. We agree on the acceptance test before building. If the working proof cannot pass, you owe nothing. Production is a separate decision.
Customer story · AMGAS Central
First working version within three days. Now live with selected teams across previously disconnected company systems.
1,349
Field assets represented
139
Customer accounts linked
What you bring
One job and enough examples to prove it.
Keep the first test narrow. A clear job and a clear judge make the three-day promise possible.
- One computer-based job your team repeats
- 5–10 representative examples, including exceptions
- The rules a good employee follows
- One 45-minute working session
- One workflow owner authorized to judge the result
Three days. One recorded decision.
The clock starts after the job, examples, exceptions, judge, and acceptance test are ready. Day three ends with a live test, not a slide deck.
Agree on the test
Choose one narrow job, review the examples and exceptions, and write down what the working proof must do to pass.
Build the working proof
We build around the agreed job and examples. No production deployment, platform migration, or long discovery project.
Run the acceptance test
We run the examples in front of the named judge and record what passed, failed, or still needs a person.
Three people keep the proof accountable.
The job, the judgment, and the technical boundary each have a named owner before the build begins.
- Executive sponsor
- Owns the business problem, authorizes the proof, and decides whether a production rollout is worth funding.
- Workflow owner and judge
- Provides examples and rules, explains exceptions, and decides whether the agreed test passed.
- Technical approver
- Reviews data access, integrations, security boundaries, and the production deployment before live work begins.
Good first jobs
Start with work people already know how to judge.
- Check invoices and flag the ones that look wrong
- Match payments with invoices
- Turn customer emails into complete support tickets
- Prepare account information before renewal calls
- Review documents and find missing information
- Sort requests and send them to the right person
- Prepare weekly reports from several tools
- Set up new customers after a deal closes
- Gather evidence for an audit
- Update records after an employee leaves
Safeguards for your team
Know the boundaries before work begins.
- No pass, no fee
- The $5,000 validation fee becomes due only after the agreed acceptance test passes. An ambiguous result has not passed.
- No production access required for the proof
- The first build can begin with representative exports, synthetic data, or a sandbox. Live access is reviewed separately.
- No hidden definition of success
- Examples, expected results, important exceptions, and the person authorized to judge the test are agreed before the clock starts.
- No unsupervised high-impact decisions
- A named person retains consequential financial, employment, customer, legal, quality, and regulatory decisions.
- No platform replacement before proof
- TruePulse works around the systems already running the business. Replacement is not required to test one job.
- No mystery at the end
- The final review shows what passed, what failed, known limitations, and what a production rollout would require.
Validation fee
$5,000
Due only after the agreed acceptance test passes. Approve a production rollout and the full amount becomes a credit toward that work.
- If it does not pass
- If the result fails or remains ambiguous against the agreed acceptance test, you owe nothing.
- If the inputs are late
- If missing examples, access, or your team’s availability blocks the test, the clock pauses.
- If it passes
- You get the working proof, acceptance-test record, known limitations, and production rollout plan.
What should your team stop doing by hand?